Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:48:17 -1000
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>
Cc:        Arthur Mesh <arthurmesh@gmail.com>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLQ==?=, obrien@freebsd.org, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?RXJsaW5nIO+/vQ==?= <des@des.no>, d@delphij.net
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r239569 - head/etc/rc.d
Message-ID:  <5050F511.6050305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1347461022.1110.29.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <86sjao7q8c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20120911205302.27484fd6@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120911200925.GA88456@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FA76A.5000209@delphij.net> <20120911211730.GB89188@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FAB87.3020701@delphij.net> <20120911215212.GA89515@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FBD15.8040907@delphij.net> <20120911230121.GA90289@dragon.NUXI.org> <504FC7B0.2060706@delphij.net> <20120912000738.GA90897@dragon.NUXI.org> <1347461022.1110.29.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 9/12/2012 4:43 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 17:07 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:22:24PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
>>> Please consider using sha512...
>>
>> What is the performance (boot time) impact on low-end MIPS and ARM
>> systems?
>>
>> I'm all for sha512, but don't want to be shot with a machine gun (vs.
>> simple pistol).
>>
> 
> For the embedded systems I take care of, the performance problem on
> low-end systems is likely to be solved by ignoring all of this angels
> dancing on a pin stuff and supplying an alternate kickstart mechanism
> appropriate to the way the system is used (which almost surely won't be
> in any national security datacenter).
> 
> I can assure you that neither shaXXX nor gzip nor anything else that
> eats that many cycles will be involved. :)
> 
> I just hope one of things coming out of all this is a reasonable
> mechanism for supplying alternate kickstart data.

I haven't yet heard any feedback on my suggestion to have one set of
default "safe" commands that are low-impact enough for embedded systems,
and another set to be added by default to more standard systems.

Do you think that this would address your concerns Ian?

Doug



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5050F511.6050305>