Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 15:36:48 -0800 (PST) From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: OSPF route propogation via zebra, gated with FreeBSD 3.4 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002081528520.17547-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My Cisco OSPF networks works just like I think it should. But I've been putting in FreeBSD routers for it's more sophisticated abilities, but I'm getting stuck in one small area. With the following configuration: Internet -> A -> B -> C -> D where A/B/C/D are all FreeBSD boxes/routers, some running gated, some running zebra while I experiment. Given that the total # of routers will be small, I plan on just lumping everything into the backbone area. As it sits right now, with everything configured in area 0, A B C see all their connected/static routes. C sees routes from D, but doesn't propogate them to B or A. If D is in area 0 as well, is it a requirement that there be a virtual link from D to A? My understanding of the virtual link requirement was only if D was in a different area, then D also needed connectivity to the backbone area. I'm tempted to convert everything to bgp, which I have more experience with, and see if it works getter. Either way is fine with me... Any tips appreciated. Can send config files on request, they're changing pretty fast as I try stuff. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10002081528520.17547-100000>