Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:41:30 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Doc BoF at EuroBSDCon Message-ID: <20041203144129.GA9061@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20041202210312.GB61027@freebsdmall.com> References: <20041128202656.GL750@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041128212851.GB48499@freebsdmall.com> <20041202201016.GL753@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041202202912.GC55779@freebsdmall.com> <20041202203848.GI17393@daemon.li> <20041202210312.GB61027@freebsdmall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-12-02 13:03, Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> wrote: > Just count my vote against removing the chapter directories. I was > alarmed by the suggestion, then I saw two votes against it in this > thread, and merely wanted to state that unless others speak up it > appears we have consensus against his proposal. Directories are not evil per se. As mentioned before, the src tree uses subdirectories quite effectively for a long time. The ports too. There is no reason why we can't hack around the make infrastructure bits to support arbitrary levels of nesting. Just my humble opinion, - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041203144129.GA9061>