Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:14:26 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libUCL / UCL as FreeBSD config question Message-ID: <20151120191426.a720ca4f4e73bd867d535104@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <564F6118.5030702@freebsd.org> References: <5B598F72-C5DD-48FD-866D-F90E117D646E@rdsor.ro> <564F6118.5030702@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:06:16 -0500 Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> wrote: > Although some limitation in libucl mean that, if you have a config > that has comments in it, the comments are lost, as they are not > represented in the in-memory version of the object that then gets > serialized for output. If you treat the config files as a database, > then this is fine, but if the user expects to still hand edit them > with an editor, this is a fairly big POLA violation. POLA as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_privilege ? > > -- > Allan Jude > --- --- Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151120191426.a720ca4f4e73bd867d535104>