Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:06:15 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20020508090615.GB9477@genius.tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020508075112.66AB638FD@overcee.wemm.org> References: <xzpd6w7ilv6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020508075112.66AB638FD@overcee.wemm.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:51:12AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > pkg_update should probably be cvs rm'ed and replaced by the portupgrade > package from the ports collection. > We can't replace it with portupgrade in the base system, because portupgrade is implemented in ruby, which isn't in the base system. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjzY6oYACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbtSQCbBy8RM5plHc8RFPwMTmVx/nGW +QYAnime6q0QOgh1BgzXNVtpEE8LWn9L =xXb+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020508090615.GB9477>