Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405061702000.82978-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200405061653.36981.sam@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Sam Leffler wrote: > > For fine-grained selection packet filtering is the better solution. This is a > simple, much lighterweight, mechanism that doesn't require touching every > packet. I would only do the tests if the packet HAD an ip option.. either way I'm not going to scream about it.. just my thoughts on the matter..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0405061702000.82978-100000>