Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:09:11 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, cracauer@cons.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pending/7574 Message-ID: <19980812110911.A12338@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <199808120045.RAA07114@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 05:45:40PM -0700 References: <19980811153137.A10707@cons.org> <199808120045.RAA07114@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <199808120045.RAA07114@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>, Satoshi Asami wrote:
> * I see, replying to PRs is still not really straigtforward :-)
>
> It's easy, as long as you reply to the right one that comes *through*
> freebsd-gnats-submit. (Actually it's your fault to begin with...see
> below. :)
>
> It happened because you added Andreas to the CC: list in your initial
> PR. Andreas replied to it, which now contains freebsd-gnats-submit in
> the CC: list, and since it doesn't have a valid PR number in the
> subject ("Re: ports/7572", etc.), it opened up another PR. And now
> you replied to Andreas' reply, and your mail says To: andreas and CC:
> freebsd-gnats-submit, so it opened up another PR (7574).
>
> Does this make sense now? :)
Ah, yes. And I always wondered why people claim GNATS isn't perfect
for relativly loosy coupled people :-)
Thanks
Martin
--
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer
cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (batched, preferred for large mails)
Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536
Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980812110911.A12338>