Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:02:35 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ports/65926: Allow to use only numbers in PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH Message-ID: <20040425130235.GA5122@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <408BA870.3000908@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200404241020.i3OAKK3p030516@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040424103137.GA27242@xor.obsecurity.org> <408BA870.3000908@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I tend to agree. I'm also worried about the impact it would have on > INDEX build times. I did the test INDEX build and here are the results: Without patch: make index 503.92s user 302.82s system 94% cpu 14:18.11 total With patch: make index 500.59s user 317.07s system 98% cpu 13:52.12 total So as you can see there is nothing to worry about. > Semi-tangentially, I'd like to one day set up a portlint tinderbox > that lists portlint warnings and errors in ports, and monitors for > changes. Yeah, it's good idea, but at first we need to clean out portlint a little, eg to fix warnings about present .la files etc -Kirill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040425130235.GA5122>