Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:56:51 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Just how standard is APM? Message-ID: <20010105155651.C1835@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200101050757.f057vbt03988@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800 References: <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> <200101050757.f057vbt03988@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > APM is standard. Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways. > > > > > > However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and > > > all you need to do is enable it. > > > > > > > Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe > > and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file). > > How new is this laptop? It may be ACPI-only. Where are we at with ACPI? Does it do power management yet? Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010105155651.C1835>