Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:36:51 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org>, Ed Maste <emaste@sandvine.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding shared code support for ia32 and amd64 -- x86 sub-branch Message-ID: <86iq9wor30.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11002161158k79c09e91w1b459ab16e14b7b1@mail.gmail.com> (Attilio Rao's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:58:06 %2B0100") References: <3bbf2fe11002151610l41526f55r5e60b5e46ce42b64@mail.gmail.com> <20100216195440.GF50403@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe11002161158k79c09e91w1b459ab16e14b7b1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> writes: > Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: > > IMO the diff is unreadable. I suggest to do actual svn cp (not svn > > mv) operation now, without a review, and post a diff that should be > > applied to x86/ directory, as well as to build glue. > I'm not sure what you mean here. I also thought svn mv was keeping the > file history (the old cvsup repocopy) and handling directly the svn > del. What he's saying is: - svn cp the files - generate and review a patch - apply the patch - fix the Makefiles - svn rm the old copies which would also preserve history. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86iq9wor30.fsf>