Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:07:32 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c Message-ID: <200403051707.32458.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrncvfqv.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200403041416.i24EGDNh035332@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzpbrncvfqv.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 04 March 2004 09:39 am, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Bruce M Simpson <bms@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Log: > > Nursemaid: Fix tinderbox builds by removing the shadowing of the global > > preprocessor macro DEBUG. DEBUG() -> CTAU_DEBUG(). > > "fix tinderbox builds" is misleading; it isn't the tinderbox that's > broken, but the code, as anyone trying to compile a debugging kernel > with ctau would quickly find out. "Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken and that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what the tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbox assuming that it's being slammed when it's not. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403051707.32458.jhb>