Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:48:42 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r268543 - in head/sys: dev/drm2 dev/drm2/i915 dev/drm2/radeon dev/etherswitch/arswitch dev/etherswitch/rtl8366 dev/iicbus sys Message-ID: <CC28F544-D0EB-4DFD-BDCD-AD2DBF4BD30D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1405129355.91430.4.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <201407120104.s6C14BYo080629@svn.freebsd.org> <1405129355.91430.4.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 11, 2014, at 18:42, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 01:04 +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Author: rpaulo >> Date: Sat Jul 12 01:04:10 2014 >> New Revision: 268543 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268543 >>=20 >> Log: >> Move iic.h to sys/ so that it's automatically installed in = /usr/include/sys. >>=20 >> This lets us call iic(4) ioctls without needing the kernel source = code >> and follows the same model of GPIO. >>=20 >> MFC after: 3 weeks >=20 > It was already available in /usr/include/dev/iicbus, and now it's not > going to be, potentially breaking out-of-tree stuff. Hrm... in fact > definitely breaking it, we have references to dev/iicbus/iic.h in our > apps at $work. Hmm. In that case, which one is correct? Should sys/gpio.h exist? -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CC28F544-D0EB-4DFD-BDCD-AD2DBF4BD30D>