Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 02:30:40 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: pst@freefall.freebsd.org (Paul Traina), CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/rdisc rdisc.8 rdisc.c DISCLAIMER Message-ID: <199602231830.CAA06130@jhome.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Feb 1996 10:22:49 PST." <199602231822.KAA11259@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> pst 96/02/23 10:04:37 >> >> Modified: sbin/rdisc rdisc.8 rdisc.c >> Removed: sbin/rdisc DISCLAIMER >> Log: >> Bring in router discovery from -current >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.1.1.1.6.1 +22 -23 src/sbin/rdisc/rdisc.8 >> 1.2.4.1 +225 -189 src/sbin/rdisc/rdisc.c > >Looks like you missed... this did _not_ commit onto the -stable branch. It did (the rcsid's confirm it), but for some reason the branch was not logged. I'd be interested to know how Paul managed this, but I think this has happen before if the person does a: "cvs update -r RELENG_2_1_0 *" What that means, is that each file has a sticky tag in the CVS/Entries file, but the directory itself (ie: CVS/Tag) doesn't, and log_accum doesn't pick that up. Well, that's my theory anyway.. Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602231830.CAA06130>