Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:32:44 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c Message-ID: <xzpoeraudpv.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200403051707.32458.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:07:32 -0500") References: <200403041416.i24EGDNh035332@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzpbrncvfqv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200403051707.32458.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > "Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken = and=20 > that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what = the=20 > tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like= =20 > above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbo= x=20 > assuming that it's being slammed when it's not. well, given the number of "this works fine here, what is the tinderbox doing wrong" comments I get... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpoeraudpv.fsf>