Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:19:26 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, dan@langille.org Subject: Re: aarch64 and armv6 vs. armv7 support: armv6 is not supported, despite what "man arch" reports Message-ID: <2F5E2EA1-246A-4098-A964-3C8DEA2EF297@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3C33BBA5-A84D-4F46-B38E-B67F9FE0196D@yahoo.com> References: <3C33BBA5-A84D-4F46-B38E-B67F9FE0196D.ref@yahoo.com> <3C33BBA5-A84D-4F46-B38E-B67F9FE0196D@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 7 Dec 2023, at 05:31, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > > man arch reports: > > QUOTE > Some machines support more than one FreeBSD ABI. Typically these are > 64-bit machines, where the “native” LP64 execution environment is > accompanied by the “legacy” ILP32 environment, which was the historical > 32-bit predecessor for 64-bit evolution. Examples are: > > LP64 ILP32 counterpart > amd64 i386 > powerpc64 powerpc > aarch64 armv6/armv7 So, this might be replaced with "armv6^armv7" or "armv6 xor armv7", then? -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.2 iF0EARECAB0WIQR6tGLSzjX8bUI5T82wXqMKLiCWowUCZXGOHgAKCRCwXqMKLiCW o1ZvAJ9KH0xs8FDDxFxyfKCQBq8Uamj6sQCg/Zp6P2J3uIM8nNcRxurUuVQj7+8= =Sx35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2F5E2EA1-246A-4098-A964-3C8DEA2EF297>