Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 08:23:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shells Message-ID: <200004160623.IAA65436@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <8davni$onp$1@atlantis.rz.tu-clausthal.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In list.freebsd-arch Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> wrote:
> With commit of tcsh, I'd like to raise another question. Are there any
> plans to replace sh with bash. Granted they're not 100% compatible,
> though my only experience with bash vs sh incompatibility was over 6
> years ago on a Linux system, I still think it's a good idea to replace
> sh with bash.
>
> Another point to consider is that most people install who use a Bourne
> Shell the bash port, just like Csh users install the tcsh port. I
> think fewer people would be inconvenienced by the replacement of sh
> with bash than by not doing so.
>
> Anyone care to comment?
Why not zsh?
--
Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany
(Info: finger userinfo:olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de)
"In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt"
(Terry Pratchett)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004160623.IAA65436>