Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:48:41 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: www/flock port fails to install Message-ID: <20080128094841.GA714@demeter.hydra>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When I try to install the Flock browser from the www/flock port, I get
the following error messages:
===> flock-0.7_7 has known vulnerabilities:
=> firefox -- multiple remote unspecified memory corruption
vulnerabilities.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/f1f6f6da-9d2f-11dc-9114-001c2514716c.html>;
=> Please update your ports tree and try again.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/flock.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/www/flock.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
/tmp/portinstall.80063.1 env make
** Fix the problem and try again.
Unfortunately, it's already up to date, according to my output from
portsnap:
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
Am I missing something here? Is the linux-flock port the only Flock
browser port that is currently maintained, for some reason? Why is the
www/flock port still there if it's uninstallable without overriding dire
warnings about the End Of The World As We Know It? Have I done something
dumb to my system so that it won't update the Flock port to a version I
can install?
I'm on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE for i386 on this machine. Thanks in advance
for your time.
--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Patrick J. LoPresti: "Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1)
Generates a syslog message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk
quota by 100K; and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080128094841.GA714>