Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:33:06 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: knu@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on 'Attic'. Message-ID: <20010917173306.D15600@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010917092722.A83010@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:27:22AM -0700 References: <20010917115742.A11675@tao.org.uk> <20010917092722.A83010@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:27:22AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:57:42AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > Looking at the following commit I notice however that this was never > > done in the case of modifications to files. I'm inclined to modify the > > code to remove the word Attic here too. Opinions? > > No. I don't like that `cvs rm' does not mention the Attic, but I can > live with that. It is still helpful to see .../Attic/... on commits to > branches where a file has been removed from the head as it gives a > reminder of the state of things. It's irrelevant to a commit on a branch whether a file exists on the HEAD or not. At least, it's not directly relevant to the commit message in question. One can post-process the commit message locally if they wish to add that information IMHO. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjumJcIACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZqLwCdGi29+2cwfosGtl7TB2rAmseH 7HsAoLRo5pE3j+VyuxgiIfhxREdQ23cd =LdV9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010917173306.D15600>