Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:55:34 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Wireless <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Intel Alder Lake iwlwifi update Message-ID: <CAN6yY1sWbji%2BQP1xmfPoS95HFxpjbd7tDwsJ9EpUcYGEiSsa6Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28rs4nnq-s3ps-0qn7-06pp-678n085q4966@serrofq.bet> References: <CAN6yY1t9PFgkfN%2B%2BKOhToeJe-rwS2B%2Be=FOWsJZ8zQcde8fqdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokNVysPQ8R_KqiCNr0kFt6qV6ei5rS1pP8X%2B-m6Dvs0RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1uvU8L1AUBQ5f9R4UYH-x%2B5vK%2BLfUUzGQaRTJiyTVh-zA@mail.gmail.com> <60o437or-p084-3ps6-os5r-s4626p275ss6@SerrOFQ.bet> <CAN6yY1vxP-TTVaj4eDs7%2Bth8zqJiJSJ0rUn3HEakv3d4wCDfOg@mail.gmail.com> <28rs4nnq-s3ps-0qn7-06pp-678n085q4966@serrofq.bet>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2025, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > That looks a bit disappointing. Not that I can claim to really understand > > most of it. > > compat.linuxkpi.80211.wlan0.dump_stas: > > lsta 0xfffff80001333000 sta 0xfffff800013331c0 added_to_drv 1 > > nl80211_sta_info (valid fields) > > 0x00004503<BEACON_RX,BEACON_SIGNAL_AVG,SIGNAL_AVG,RX_BITRATE,TX_BITRATE> > > connected_time 0 inactive_time 0 > > rx_bytes 0 rx_packets 0 rx_dropped_misc 0 > > rx_duration 0 rx_beacon 16464 rx_beacon_signal_avg -46 > > tx_bytes 0 tx_packets 0 tx_failed 0 > > tx_duration 0 tx_retries 0 > > signal 0 signal_avg -47 ack_signal 0 avg_ack_signal 0 > > You have good singal. > > > generation 0 assoc_req_ies_len 0 chains 0 > > rxrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2 > > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_gi 0 > > txrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2 > > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_g > > > You are on VHT80 with MCS 9 NSS 2 with Short Guard Interval (SGI). > That's the maximum possible on VHT80. That should give you 3-500Mbit/s > RX locally as single user. At least others have reported that. > > It'll be a few seconds before the firmware will fully ramp up to use > that but it seems you managed. > > Hard to say what's going wrong without much further debugging. > > What kind of speedtest were you using? > Ookla speedtest between Livermore, Cal and Comcast in San Francisco. Used the same endpoints and software for both tests. Do you have any chance to test a local target? > I'll try putting iperf3 on my server. It's hard wired to my router, so any issues should be on my system > > /bz > > -- > Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7 > -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small">On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM Bjoern A. Zeeb <<a href="mailto:bz@freebsd.org">bz@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:</div></div><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Thu, 19 Jun 2025, Kevin Oberman wrote:<br> <br> > That looks a bit disappointing. Not that I can claim to really understand<br> > most of it.<br> > compat.linuxkpi.80211.wlan0.dump_stas:<br> > lsta 0xfffff80001333000 sta 0xfffff800013331c0 added_to_drv 1<br> > nl80211_sta_info (valid fields)<br> > 0x00004503<BEACON_RX,BEACON_SIGNAL_AVG,SIGNAL_AVG,RX_BITRATE,TX_BITRATE><br> > connected_time 0 inactive_time 0<br> > rx_bytes 0 rx_packets 0 rx_dropped_misc 0<br> > rx_duration 0 rx_beacon 16464 rx_beacon_signal_avg -46<br> > tx_bytes 0 tx_packets 0 tx_failed 0<br> > tx_duration 0 tx_retries 0<br> > signal 0 signal_avg -47 ack_signal 0 avg_ack_signal 0<br> <br> You have good singal.<br> <br> > generation 0 assoc_req_ies_len 0 chains 0<br> > rxrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2<br> > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_gi 0<br> > txrate: flags 6<VHT_MCS,SGI> bw 4(80) legacy 0 kbit/s mcs 9 nss 2<br> > he_dcm 0 he_gi 0 he_ru_alloc 0 eht_g<br> <br> <br> You are on VHT80 with MCS 9 NSS 2 with Short Guard Interval (SGI).<br> That's the maximum possible on VHT80. That should give you 3-500Mbit/s<br> RX locally as single user. At least others have reported that.<br> <br> It'll be a few seconds before the firmware will fully ramp up to use<br> that but it seems you managed.<br> <br> Hard to say what's going wrong without much further debugging.<br> <br> What kind of speedtest were you using?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Ookla speedtest between Livermore, Cal and Comcast in San Francisco. Used the same endpoints and software for both tests.</div><div style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> Do you have any chance to test a local target?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I'll try putting iperf3 on my server. It's hard wired to my router, so any issues should be on my system</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br> /bz<br> <br> -- <br> Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7<br> </blockquote></div><div><br clear="all"></div><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer<br>E-mail: <a href="mailto:rkoberman@gmail.com" target="_blank">rkoberman@gmail.com</a><br></div><div>PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1sWbji%2BQP1xmfPoS95HFxpjbd7tDwsJ9EpUcYGEiSsa6Q>