Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 19:10:49 -0700 From: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <200405241910.49207.david@usermode.org> In-Reply-To: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com> References: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 23 May 2004 08:52 pm, С ·Éçç wrote: > So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than > rewriting a completely > different architecture for the installer ? Anaconda is certainly an option, but I doubt a binary-only Anaconda is. Think about it. We need to go beyond running Redhat's installer in Linux compatibility mode. Also. SuSE just open sourced their YaST installer. That's an option as well. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405241910.49207.david>