Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 00:15:44 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI LKM Drivers ? Message-ID: <19980217001544.05555@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <19980216221754.09856@mi.uni-koeln.de>; from Stefan Esser on Mon, Feb 16, 1998 at 10:17:54PM %2B0100 References: <199802050526.VAA00603@rah.star-gate.com> <19980216221754.09856@mi.uni-koeln.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 16, 1998 at 10:17:54PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > On 1998-02-04 21:26 -0800, Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> wrote: > > Curious, what is the correct way to load an LKM PCI driver? > > You need a version of the PCI code, that was not yet tagged > into the -stable tree: pci.c (1.64), pcibus.h (1.8) [... details deleted ...] > For the case of the Bt848 driver just replace (with > the above mentioned versions of pci.c and pcibus.h > compiled into the kernel): Does this mean it is intentional that later versions of the PCI code (post pci.c 1.72) don't have LKM support, and I have to have -stable to develop using PCI LKMs? As Amancio, I'm planning to hack on the Bt848-driver, and not having to reboot every time would be _very_ convenient. However, for the hacking I do on FreeBSD, I need to have -current... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980217001544.05555>