Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:37:40 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Bart Van Kerckhove <bart@it-ss.be> Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OT - Quagga/CARP Message-ID: <20060316193740.GE11850@spc.org> In-Reply-To: <014e01c64928$6107abd0$020b000a@bartwrkstxp> References: <C935A1DF-4F65-4D5A-991B-B8A6C7E7DE24@staff.openaccess.org> <014e01c64928$6107abd0$020b000a@bartwrkstxp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:35:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote: > Is this by design, or just lack of time/interest? > If anyone feels up to the task of fixing/implementing what's needed to make > this work, we'd be happy to sponsor its development. This is a collision between the connected route implicitly created by configuring an interface which has the same prefix length as an existing route in the FreeBSD FIB. This is a known issue and is by design. Most BSD-derived implementations have this limitation. It needs to be resolved in preparation for equal-cost multipath. Sadly whilst I'd be more than happy to work on this (with or without funding), I don't have the free time to do so, but I may be able to eke out spare time to look at patches. Regards, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060316193740.GE11850>