Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 04:47:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL 0.9.5a merge Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008200446320.24903-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000820113937.36B8DE6A02@netcom1.netcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Mike Harding wrote:
>
> Kris - would it be reasonable to support the port as a way to 'tune'
> your SSL? It already seems to pick up the right CPU and all and so
> you could theoretically do a NO_OPENSSL=YES if you are a power user
> and use the ports. You would just want the port to drop the library
> in the right place...
I don't want to support that because it's a whole extra set of unknowns. I
understand the lack of assembler code is an issue, but once that is solved
it shouldn't be necessary.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008200446320.24903-100000>