Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:31:18 -0400
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock), jkh@time.cdrom.com, rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Latest Current build failure
Message-ID:  <9609041731.AA18207@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199609041713.KAA06682@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <Pine.SV4.3.93.960904094546.7641B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> <199609041713.KAA06682@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 4 Sep 1996 10:13:19 -0700 (MST), Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> said:

> It is a fit.  It is not "the optimal fit", which is what this whole thread
> has been about -- system engineers, like me and Richard, compalining about
> the process itself not being meta-engineered.

And those of us who are actually doing useful work complain about too
much flamage about the process from those who aren't.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9609041731.AA18207>