Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:32:41 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: "'chat@freebsd.org'" <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Workstations Message-ID: <20030415222955.I75698-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <20030415015011.S2937@znfgre.tberna.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Etienne de Bruin wrote: > > > Greetings - Our company is considering a move to Red Hat as an alternative > > for Windows workstations and I would like to present a healthy reason why > > FreeBSD would be a 'better' OS to install on our work stations. > > Here's a revolutionary idea... red hat may actually be a better desktop > OS that FreeBSD. Personally I'd be focusing on the joy that is removal of > more microsoft products. :) > Or not - it depends on specifics. RH is not always such a nice ride on the desktop either. > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030415222955.I75698-100000>