Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:10:36 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release schedules Message-ID: <20081214171036.GC6979@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <4944077F.9000701@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20081112120147.GA62386@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <f2c294a10812120920l4d11bebfgd5c9208336b075b@mail.gmail.com> <18754.42851.295211.155980@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4ad871310812121028m4e368da4n69e06d592e312eb0@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750812121113o1590d54r9962ec3d22a20bdb@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310812121128y18db1c19n8aa45dcc75794739@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750812121149r6581ace1gec21e415afe3deca@mail.gmail.com> <f2c294a10812121220r78835060n5ed756051e92d916@mail.gmail.com> <20081212155145.1618810a@scorpio> <4944077F.9000701@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat 2008-12-13 19:05:35 UTC+0000, Matthew Seaman (m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) wrote: > Ports aren't actually frozen at the moment. Neither are they > completely open for any sort of updates. Instead they're in a 'slush' > -- no sweeping changes permitted, no major changes to the > infrastructure (ie. bsd.ports.mk, that sort of thing). How does one determine the state (frozen/slush/unfrozen/other?) of the Ports tree? Is the state kept in the tree itself?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081214171036.GC6979>