Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 14:38:24 +0100 (BST) From: Paul Richards <paul@netcraft.co.uk> To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Cc: paul@freebsd.org, ache@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-user@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/libexec/telnetd ext.h Message-ID: <199508041338.OAA15480@server.netcraft.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199508041311.PAA21140@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Aug 4, 95 03:11:01 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Mark Murray who said > > > Hmm, I obviously haven't been paying enough attention but can someone > > explain to me why we have two telnetd's in the tree? > > The one in secure is <ahem> secure. It includes unexportable crypto code. Umm, yeah I sort of knew that, but why do we have a non-exportable version sitting in the main tree? Despite paying quite close attention to all the crypto discussions I've clearly missed something. I though we segregated the non-exportable stuff into secure so that we knew where it all was and could ship it as a separate module. One module in the US built from secure/* and another for the rest of the world built and shipped from your site. What happens to /usr/src/libexec/telnetd in all this? > > > Incidentally, I didn't ifdef my change since I didn't see much point > > in keeping 4.4 BSD as the default string since 4.4 is defunct so no-one's > > ever going to use it again. > > Eh? You sure? :-) Positive :-) We're freeBSD now and will be forever more. -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508041338.OAA15480>