Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:04:22 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 78828 for review Message-ID: <200506231604.23036.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200506231444.08027.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200506222312.j5MNChMh079831@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506231444.08027.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 23 June 2005 11:44 am, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 22 June 2005 07:12 pm, Peter Wemm wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=78828 > > > > Change 78828 by peter@peter_melody on 2005/06/22 23:12:33 > > > > Freeze things for the dump snapshot. > > This may be a bad idea since we may panic with sched_lock held and it > would be very nice to get a dump there and not just deadlock. Yeah. I'm really not sure what to do though because with interrupts still happening, it upsets some of the driver dump routines. eg: when you call this from ddb. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506231604.23036.peter>