Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:28:14 +0100
From:      Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>
To:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone?
Message-ID:  <54AAE5CE.7050408@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131209112232.GR29825@droso.dk>
References:  <529D9CC5.8060709@rancid.berkeley.edu> <20131204095855.GY29825@droso.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312041212000.2022@badger.tharned.org> <20131205083044.GN29825@droso.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312051129490.22007@roadkill.tharned.org> <20131209112232.GR29825@droso.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 Bezüglich Erwin Lansing's Nachricht vom 09.12.2013 12:22 (localtime):
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:34:31AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>>> Thanks Greg, and thanks for the feedback.  I did make sure that the 
>>> chroot still is supported on existing 8 and 9 systems, so the move will 
>>> be another part in the upgrade procedure to a new major release and 
>>> lessen the pain a bit.  Let me have another look into reintroducing the 
>>> chroot bits in a less complicated way.  It may not be exactly the same 
>>> as before but hopefully can be done in a backwards compatible way.
>>>
>> Thank you Erwin.  Let me know if I can help in any way.
>>
> Sorry for the delay.  I've spent too much time already on this.  The
> problem is that there are several assumption to how the paths are formed
> in both the ports Makefile (and thus things like pkg-plist and used to
> generate the configuration files) and the rc script that sets up the
> chroot.  Fixing one, breaks the other, so some more magic is required.
> I hacked up the original chroot code enough that it sets up the chroot,
> copies in the confiruation files, etc. but then ends up that the
> configuration files were generated on the assumption that is was a
> normal port prefix and thus expect things to be in
> /var/named/usr/local/etc/named/... which is of course a fine chroot, but
> not compatible with the pre-10 setup.
>
> I think a complete rewrite is needed to do this right, for which I don't
> have time over the next few days.  The net/isc-dhcp*-server ports might

Unfortunately I don't have time too, but various other mentioned
work-arrounds/replacements isn't what I need/want, personlly.
So I spent some time reenabling auto-chroot, please see
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196520

It just works for me, haven't done much testing. Most of the routines
are taken from former base rc.d/named with little tuning.

I hope this helps for the moment.

-Harry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54AAE5CE.7050408>