Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:54:35 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR state revision Message-ID: <20020318195435.A15520@databits.net> In-Reply-To: <xzppu21jtq0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:18:15AM %2B0100 References: <xzppu21jtq0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
++ 19/03/02 01:18 +0100 - Dag-Erling Smorgrav: | In light of the controversy and confusion that reign over the precise | meaning of the "feedback" state, I would like to suggest the following | revision of the Gnats states: | [...] | feedback Further work requires additional information from the | originator or the community - possibly confirmation of | the effectiveness of a proposed solution. I think this is _much_ better than what we currently have. | patched Patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or | confirmation from originator) are still open. This is great! "feedback" was definately the wrong category for this... "patched" is much more descriptive. --pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318195435.A15520>