Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:07:50 -0700 From: Charles Randall <crandall@matchlogic.com> To: 'Matt Dillon' <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: RE: Machines are getting too damn fast Message-ID: <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B30130828E882@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Noted. Is there a gcc PR associated with this? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl A GNATS searc for "freebsd kernel" didn't return anything. -Charles -----Original Message----- From: Matt Dillon [mailto:dillon@earth.backplane.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:44 AM To: Charles Randall Cc: Andrew Gallatin; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: Machines are getting too damn fast :Which begs the question I've tried to ask a number of times in different :forums. Who's working on P4 optimizations and code generation for the P4? I'd be happy if GCC -O2 just worked without introducing bugs. I want to be able to compile the kernel with it again. -Matt :Sure, i386 code will run but the benchmarks seem to indicate that peak :performance is heavily dependent on a good optimizing compiler. : :A query to the gcc mailing list returned no responses. : :Charles To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B30130828E882>