Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:25:44 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Grover Lines <grover@ceribus.net> Subject: Re: Proper way to run bind9 Message-ID: <xzpoejuvmh3.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040924222550.F6548@URF.trarfvf> (Doug Barton's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:27:49 %2B0100 (BST)") References: <1096042856.24267.6.camel@purgatory.ceribus.net> <xzpsm97v49e.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040924222550.F6548@URF.trarfvf>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> writes: > It's actually not named.pid in our structure. As explained in the note > behind the variable, we set the pid-file variable in named.conf so > that named running wit h -u bind (but not chrooted) will still be able > to drop a pid file in /var/run/named, which is chowned to user bind. Ack, sorry. I didn't realized you'd changed it in named.conf as well. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpoejuvmh3.fsf>