Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:23:49 +0800 (CST) From: huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> To: "eclipse@freebsd.org" <eclipse@freebsd.org> Cc: "gnn@neville-neil.com" <gnn@neville-neil.com> Subject: Re: Moving eclipse-devel to eclipse Message-ID: <1376871829.53222.YahooMailNeo@web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Hi, On 2013/08/19 04:07, George Neville-Neil wrote: This work is nearly done. I've tested locally and the new eclipse, formerly eclipse-devel, installs and runs. Since this is now going to be eclipse instead of devel I am planning to commit this port with a .1 PORTREVISION. That would make eclipse show up as: eclipse-4.2.0_1 Does that make sense to everyone? I often used eclipse-devel and got two main problems of our eclipse-devel: 1. eclipse is very slow switching editors, especially XML: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391868 2. If install EMF SDK from juno repository, all of installed plug-in will be disable. Maybe the better way is: Switch to eclipse from eclipse-devel after eclipse-devel upgrade to 4.2.2 or 4.3. Cheers, --hwh From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 02:59:47 2013 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48710F9 for <eclipse@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from vps.hungerhost.com (vps.hungerhost.com [216.38.53.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2F62C16 for <eclipse@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pool-96-250-5-62.nycmny.fios.verizon.net ([96.250.5.62]:51960 helo=minion.home) by vps.hungerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <gnn@neville-neil.com>) id 1VBFg1-0005PE-LW; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:58:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Moving eclipse-devel to eclipse From: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <1376871829.53222.YahooMailNeo@web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:58:42 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <DA3E520F-6E73-46F8-8A7F-54F2576AF2B2@neville-neil.com> References: <1376871829.53222.YahooMailNeo@web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> To: huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps.hungerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - neville-neil.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vps.hungerhost.com: authenticated_id: gnn@neville-neil.com Cc: "eclipse@freebsd.org" <eclipse@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." <freebsd-eclipse.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-eclipse>, <mailto:freebsd-eclipse-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-eclipse>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-eclipse-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse>, <mailto:freebsd-eclipse-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:59:47 -0000 On Aug 18, 2013, at 20:23 , huanghwh <huanghwh@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2013/08/19 04:07, George Neville-Neil wrote: > > This work is nearly done. I've tested locally and the new eclipse, formerly eclipse-devel, installs and runs. > Since this is now going to be eclipse instead of devel I am planning to commit this port with > a .1 PORTREVISION. That would make eclipse show up as: eclipse-4.2.0_1 Does that make sense to everyone? > I often used eclipse-devel and got two main problems of our eclipse-devel: > > 1. eclipse is very slow switching editors, especially XML: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391868 > 2. If install EMF SDK from juno repository, all of installed > plug-in will be disable. > > Maybe the better way is: Switch to eclipse from eclipse-devel > after eclipse-devel upgrade to 4.2.2 or 4.3. Have you filed PRs for these issues? The first issue has a patch available so that could be applied in the eclipse area after the move. The second one I don't anything about. Has it been discussed here before? I'd like to get eclipse out of the way as it's very very old, and then fix bugs in the new eclipse while porting the newest eclipse-devel. I do not want to block the move on bugs that have patches. Best, Georgehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1376871829.53222.YahooMailNeo>