Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:01:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Aasmund Eikli <inter@o12a.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/100312: Small blurb in explaining-bsd article Message-ID: <200607142201.k6EM1UXG001677@fbsd.fido.local> Resent-Message-ID: <200607142200.k6EM0i9I031294@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>Number: 100312
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: Small blurb in explaining-bsd article
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Fri Jul 14 22:00:44 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Aasmund Eikli
>Release: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD fbsd.fido.local 6.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Fri Jul 14 02:27:23 CEST 2006 root@fbsd.fido.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/INTER i386
>Description:
I was skimming the explaining-bsd article and it occured to me that in it's points on which OS to use it doesn't mention
any documentation effort. I included a small addition to the list.
>How-To-Repeat:
n/a
>Fix:
I suppose this is a test patch to see if I did this right. Sorry if I messed up.
--- article.sgml.old Fri Jul 14 23:22:07 2006
+++ article.sgml Fri Jul 14 23:32:52 2006
@@ -547,6 +547,12 @@
</listitem>
<listitem>
+ <para>BSD projects have a large emphasis on good documentation. The various
+ documentation projects aim to provide actively updated documentation in many languages
+ covering all aspects of the individual BSD system.
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
<para>The BSD license may be more attractive than the GPL.</para>
</listitem>
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607142201.k6EM1UXG001677>