Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:12:32 -0500 From: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227778 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <CAK2BMK4DP=japDufnbMUgqMgmL7rRye4wMrwqzHePyreNwiu-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201111210417.pAL4HOdi023556@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201111210417.pAL4HOdi023556@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> w= rote: > Author: lstewart > Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011 > New Revision: 227778 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227778 > > Log: > =A0- When feed-forward clock support is compiled in, change the BPF heade= r to > =A0 =A0contain both a regular timestamp obtained from the system clock an= d the > =A0 =A0current feed-forward ffcounter value. This enables new possibiliti= es including Is it really necessary to make the ABI dependent on a kernel configuration option? This causes all sorts of headaches if loadable modules ever want to use that ABI, something that we just ran into with vm_page_t and friends and had a long thread on -current about. -Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK2BMK4DP=japDufnbMUgqMgmL7rRye4wMrwqzHePyreNwiu-Q>