Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:43:35 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> To: Tsung-li Wu <twu2@eos.ncsu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question in network card setup Message-ID: <Pine.UW2.3.95.980112103940.12614I-100000@cedb> In-Reply-To: <34B9343A.754D@eos.ncsu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 1998, Tsung-li Wu wrote: > ed0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.1.2.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.2.255 > ether 00:20:18:72:3f:e3 > ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 10.1.2.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.2.255 > ether 00:20:18:72:3f:de > lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > tun0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552 > lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > And a message "starting standard daemons:inetd cron sendmail ... kernel: > arp: 00:20:18:72:3f:e3 is using my IP address 10.1.2.100!" kept showing > on the screen. It might be a bug but first you should try using correct netmasks. If both interfaces really are on the same network (why?) then give the second card a netmask of 0xffffffff. Otherwise give both cards the right netmask, i.e. 0xffffff80 for 2 126 host nets. Get back to us if you still have problems. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.UW2.3.95.980112103940.12614I-100000>