Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:28:37 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: mdf@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas Message-ID: <CAF-QHFW=aU3=iKE9WMg6%2BD6eP9OXth=c0AidBc140ykmAPD2zg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com> <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 August 2011 18:33, <mdf@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>> right? >>> >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >> >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". > > This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI > is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where > there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets. > > You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled" > at the boot loader prompt. Unfortunately, neither the memtest or the srat disabling tunables worked (I also tried disabling srat.4). My time with the machine is over, so I can't do more testing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFW=aU3=iKE9WMg6%2BD6eP9OXth=c0AidBc140ykmAPD2zg>