Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:50:25 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: bz0fbd@zabbadoz.net Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, dfr@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r195181 - in head/sys: nfsclient nfsserver Message-ID: <20090630.085025.143671772.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090630051641.T22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200906300318.n5U3Ipr4066645@svn.freebsd.org> <20090630051641.T22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20090630051641.T22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
bz0fbd@zabbadoz.net writes:
: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
:
: > Author: jhb
: > Date: Tue Jun 30 03:18:51 2009
: > New Revision: 195181
: > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195181
: >
: > Log:
: > Fix build with NFS_LEGACYRPC enabled after the socket upcall locking
: > changes.
:
: is this really a good idea, considering that NFS_LEGACYRPC is on the
: "removal list" for 8.0?
:
: Will it go or will it stay? I thought it was already (partly) gone?
I thought it was still needed for a few embedded platforms...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630.085025.143671772.imp>