Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:00:04 -0500 From: "Talbot, Paul" <paul.talbot@eds.com> To: "'Garance A Drosihn'" <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: portversion/portupgrade Message-ID: <F455E4114C4AD211BCDF00805F31BCF312B27EEB@USSAM203>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My x86 box doesn't exhibit the problem. -Paul -----Original Message----- From: Garance A Drosihn [mailto:drosih@rpi.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:55 PM To: Kris Kennaway; Talbot, Paul Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portversion/portupgrade At 2:47 PM -0700 5/28/03, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, May 28, 2003, Talbot, Paul wrote: > > >> Hello all... >> > > I have an issue with portversion and portupgrade (20030427) on > > my Ultra 10.... > > > After running the 'portsdb -Uu' command, I get the following > > output from portversion and portupgrade: > > >> localhost# portversion >> ** No package matching '*' was found. >> localhost# >> >> localhost# portupgrade -a >> ** No such package '*' is installed. >> localhost# > >Yes, this is known to be broken. knu is aware of it, but seems to be >too busy to fix it. If there are any other ruby hackers out there who >are familiar with the ruby internals, fixing this would be a great >help. Do you know if this a bug in ruby itself, or is it only in portversion && portupgrade? Is it only happening on sparc64? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F455E4114C4AD211BCDF00805F31BCF312B27EEB>