Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:36:12 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: kthreads, kprocs? Message-ID: <fffh3t$2ac$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, I've seen the cvs notice about kthread renaming to kprocs, and I wonder why - what's the need for "proper" kthreads and how will it be different from current implementation of kprocs? Will it mimic userland to form a "hierarchy": processes have threads? Why, since all the kernel is a single context wrt memory protection? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHG0e8ldnAQVacBcgRAtw6AKD0v+dAFC/njlkshzo4MZLWtDhcwACgzrpj kVcY2kiy3VUoaYgJvPJ1F3Q= =bVV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fffh3t$2ac$1>