Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jun 2001 00:54:14 +0200
From:      Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com>
To:        John Daniels <jmd526@hotmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: JDK ports revisited
Message-ID:  <20010606005414.A12530@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
In-Reply-To: <F20NfobWCYrdobkDzZ20000ac8b@hotmail.com>; from jmd526@hotmail.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 06:27:37PM -0400
References:  <F20NfobWCYrdobkDzZ20000ac8b@hotmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John,

John Daniels wrote:
> Is it better to group by jdk or platform?
> 
>       java/platform-src-jdkxx    (current practice)
> vs.
>       java/jdkxx-src-plaform

Personally I prefer your suggested naming scheme, but in the spirit of the
existing FreeBSD ports I think platform-src-jdkXX is the way to go.

> Everyone agrees that there is no need for a third digit in the version 
> number? (jdk1x = latest version of 1.x)

Well, this depends. There are pros and cons for both approaches. Most people
prefer not having a third digit. This group does not include me, the more JDKs
I can install, the better. But I do agree the ports system will get bloated
pretty quickly otherwise.


Ernst

-- 
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology

    "Come to me all who are weary and burdened
        and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010606005414.A12530>