Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:02:43 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: ithread preemption Message-ID: <XFMail.20020906110243.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3D78098B.CEBF13EC@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06-Sep-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> > Hey ... I think you have it on the nose! That makes the most sense >> > I've heard yet. >> > >> > Do we have any way to bind a thread to a cpu? >> >> I used to. Then KSE3 was committed. I suppose I could rewrite it from >> scratch again. > > The ithreads are different from threads. People don't seem to > get this idea, but it is nevertheless true. Having general support for binding threads to a CPU is something in the scheduler itself, not something buried in ithreads alone. The rest of your message is irrelevant to the actual situation at hand. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020906110243.jhb>