Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:44:16 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Non-compliant FreeBSD behavior? Message-ID: <20030411.134416.71552075.imp@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
A number of places I've seen says that the BUGGY section should be
identical to the else part. That is, setting O_NONBLOCK via fcntl
should result in the same behavior as setting it using FIONBIO.
However, I've observed that for both threaded and unthreaded programs
the BUGGY part doesn't work, while the other part does. Is there
something subtle I'm missing? What do the standards have to say about
this?
Warner
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
int fd;
struct in_addr addr;
struct sockaddr_in sa;
int flags;
fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
inet_aton("1.2.3.4", &addr);
sa.sin_len = sizeof(sa);
sa.sin_family = AF_INET;
sa.sin_port = htons(1234);
memcpy(&sa.sin_addr, &addr, sizeof(addr));
#if BUGGY
flags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL, NULL);
flags |= O_NONBLOCK;
if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, &flags) == -1)
err(1, "fcntl");
#else
flags = 1;
if (ioctl(fd, FIONBIO, &flags))
err(1, "ioctl");
#endif
if (connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sa, sizeof(sa)))
err(1, "connect");
exit(0);
}
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411.134416.71552075.imp>