Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:10:15 -0600
From:      "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net>
To:        Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/share/doc/{en*,fr*,ja*,ru*}
Message-ID:  <20001223141015.A78788@peorth.iteration.net>
In-Reply-To: <p05001928b66aaa18e755@[192.168.168.205]>; from rdm@cfcl.com on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 11:54:54AM -0800
References:  <p0500191db668b6c488a3@> <20001222153135.A35560@mithrandr.moria.org> <7msnnf8pbp.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <p05001926b66a8dd442a6@[192.168.168.205]> <20001223204328.A57711@mithrandr.moria.org> <p05001928b66aaa18e755@[192.168.168.205]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 11:54:54AM -0800, Rich Morin scribbled:
| At 8:43 PM +0200 12/23/00, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
| >>  Actually, that directory tree needs a general clean-up and re-
| >>  organization; perhaps the ja problem could be dealt with as part
| >>  of a general reshuffling.  Is anyone brave enough to suggest
| >>  a new arrangement for the directory?
| >
| >What sort of clean-up?
| 
| No, you don't understand; I was trying to get RID of that monkey (:-).
| 
| One (rather extreme :-) possibility would be to rearrange /usr/share:
| 
| /usr/share/
|    code/
|      examples/, libg++/, mk/, perl/, skel/
|    data/
|      calendar/, dict/, games/, isdn/, zoneinfo/
|    doc/
|      bsd/
|        faq@, handbook/
|      unix/
|        papers/, psd/, smm/, usd/
|      info/
|      intl/
|        en@, es@, ...
|        long/
|          en_US.ISO_8859-1/, es_ES.ISO_8859-1/, ...
|      man/
|      misc/
|        ntp/
|    docprep/
|      groff_font/, me/, pcvt/, syscons/, tabset/, tmac/
|    intl/
|      locale/, nls/, vi/

This proposal requires the cooperation with all of the translation 
teams, since you are asking for a major change here.  However,
I do not see the point of reorganizing for the sake of reogranizing.
Many applications expect certain behaviors.  In addition, other parts
of src/ expects things to be at a certain place with regards to POSIX.
Sheldon would be the one to answer the POSIX questions. :)

I know for a fact that all of the locales are there because everyone
expects the locales to be there by _standard_.

Your groff and syscons fonts are there and expected to be there.
A few others on the list are: mk, perl, skel, zoneinfo, data, info,
ntp, vi, nls, bla bla bla ...

mtree and the buildworld process would have to be changed too.

I think you understand my point.  Changing this structure requires
needless and a large effort for three major branches, many src/ hackers, 
many translation teams.  Not that I am saying change is a bad thing,
but I see no real reason to violate POLA as well as POSIX.

Would you care to explain why you want /usr/share this way?

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| keichii@peorth.iteration.net         | keichii@bsdconspiracy.net |
| http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001223141015.A78788>