Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:53:01 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: docs/50349: make release fails with NO_OPENSSH and ! NOKERBEROS Message-ID: <20031006115301.GA52277@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20031006102006.GA76051@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20031004190337.GB94900@sunbay.com> <200310041930.h94JUCYJ065458@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20031005041432.GC9334@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20031005184629.GB37106@sunbay.com> <20031006102006.GA76051@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:46:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:14:32AM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:30:12PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > >=20 > > > > The crypto stuff in nicely separated out, and I wouldn't mind seeing > > > > further separation (dev tools, LPR, sendmail, etc) done as separate= ly > > > > installable components, similar to the crypto install. > > >=20 > > > A current interest is having some sort of binary updates system > > > in place. Everyone I talk to about the various issues, projects in > > > motion, etc. say this further separation of stuff would help that > > > effort a LOT. > > >=20 > > The (crypto) stuff is already well separated, it's just that > > we don't want to further complicate release/Makefile to > > account for the NOCRYPT option -- it's much easier to remove > > the unneeded bits after release is rolled. >=20 > What about this then: >=20 > [stijn@pcwin002] <~> ldd /usr/bin/fetch=20 > /usr/bin/fetch: > libfetch.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/libfetch.so.3 (0x28076000) > libssl.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x28083000) > libcrypto.so.3 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x280b5000) > libc.so.5 =3D> /lib/libc.so.5 (0x281c3000) >=20 > It seems to me that a release build with crypto and installed without > will miss /usr/bin/fetch, or will it simply not work? Haven't tried yet, > but I was just wondering. >=20 cd /usr/src/release && make -V FIXCRYPTO You should see the usr.bin/fetch there; this means that the release.3 stage of "make release" recompiles it without crypto support and puts the crypto-free binary into the "base" distribution. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/gVedUkv4P6juNwoRArdRAJwMa0D830NHUBPvch3tYZfJ0BP0EQCggh3O O3MwgMNe2uPfuXylC+Fm/6Y= =JqIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031006115301.GA52277>