Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 12:05:14 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway <kkenn@rebel.net.au> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Keith Stevenson <k.stevenson@louisville.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM & LDAP in FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907201203590.3461-100000@morden.rebel.net.au> In-Reply-To: <37939F8E.7B9E0E16@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Wes Peters wrote: > > Given that this is a PAM module, wouldn't /etc/pam.conf be more appropriate? > > /etc/pam.conf would be appropriate for configuring the behavior of PAM > modules. /etc/auth.conf would be appropriate for configuring WHICH > authentication method to use. Let's please don't confuse the two. In my work on modularizing crypt() (which is almost ready for another alpha release) I'm using login classes in /etc/login.conf instead of system-global settings in /etc/auth.conf to decide password hash schemes. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907201203590.3461-100000>