Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:37:43 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Logo Contest Message-ID: <535601999.20050210213743@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <1108067044.658.12.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> References: <200502091349.00708.algould@datawok.com> <1709665858.20050210101217@wanadoo.fr> <20050210114338.B30327@one.thequestion.net> <299713472.20050210210055@wanadoo.fr> <1108067044.658.12.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julio Capote writes: > Untrue, I know a NUMBER of emerging graphic artists, who would kill for > this kind of exposure, and are much better than any commercialized firm > I've seen. If they are so good, why would they kill for this kind of exposure? The world of commercial art is no exception to the rule that you get what you pay for. Good graphic art is worth paying for; for a price of zero dollars, you'll get zero quality. Exceptions are very, very rare, and cannot be depended on. And an amateurish logo would be quite a liability. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?535601999.20050210213743>