Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:50:06 +0100 From: "Michael Carr" <sphaleotas@blueyonder.co.uk> To: "FreeBSD Chat" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FYI: Plan9 open sourced Message-ID: <090f01c3377e$5f1aba60$141a1e3e@pbncomputer> References: <200306201719.h5KHJOPF085654@bitblocks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bakul wrote: > I personally feel more words mean more pain for all (and feel lawyers > should be given a "budget" of words to fashion a contract out of) but the > intent seems clear to me (but I am not a lawyer etc.). But if the intention of the license is to exact strictly minimal obligations from the user, such as the BSD license makes completely explicit, then logically (and not just legally), why should it be necessary to employ something other than a BSD license? The devil would be precisely in the (extraneous) detail ... Regards, Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?090f01c3377e$5f1aba60$141a1e3e>