Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:22:34 -0600 From: James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: jail_set_vimage - Vimage under new jails Message-ID: <487BEDCA.8090705@gritton.org> In-Reply-To: <487BEB9F.3000502@elischer.org> References: <487BE548.3050500@gritton.org> <487BEB21.6040407@elischer.org> <487BEB9F.3000502@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
These jails are hierarchical. The "named-based" I refer to is the extensibility, where new named parameters can be set in the jail_set system call, rather than relying on a fixed structure. Perhaps I should just say "extensible" instead. - Jamie Julian Elischer wrote: >> James Gritton wrote: >> I've finished the merge of jail_set and Vimage. This uses the >> name-based jails instead of the jail-similar vimage frameworks, with >> Vimage's VNET stuff being enabled in a jail with the "vnet" parameter >> (in this scenario, it's optional whether a jail has its own network >> stack or just inherits its parent's). Once such a jail is set up, it >> behaves in the same way as a vimage does, as far as the network stack >> separation goes. The only difference is in administration, which uses >> the jail framework. > > I liked the hierarchical feature of the vimage system. > when you say "name based", do you mean the code you refer to is > not hierarchical?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487BEDCA.8090705>