Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:01:59 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104201655550.33877@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DAF5FBA.8080304@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4DAEAE1B.70207@FreeBSD.org> <20110420203754.GM85668@acme.spoerlein.net> <4DAF46F8.9040004@FreeBSD.org> <BCE89DC7-116D-48E1-BD86-DF986062B0CC@samsco.org> <4DAF5FBA.8080304@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Doug Barton wrote:

> On 04/20/2011 15:18, Scott Long wrote:
>> I agree with what Alexander is saying, but I'd like to take it a step 
>> further.  We should all be using [...] mount-by-label
>
> +1
>
> When I first saw this on linux my gut reaction was "ewwww, different." But 
> now that I've worked with it a bit, I really like it. Doing this by default 
> in 9.0 would be a really useful step forward, and would allow greater 
> innovation down the road.
>
> Is there a handy tutorial somewhere for making this change in FreeBSD? Or is 
> it even possible to do in a rational way?

Not sure I understand the question.  I have a little article called 
FreeBSD Labeled Filesystems: 
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html

It uses filesystem labels instead of device labels (except for swap). 
The differences are the utility used to create the labels and where the 
labels show up in /dev.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1104201655550.33877>